The Four Types of Engineering Leadership Every Growing Team Needs
As engineering teams grow from 5 to 50+ people, leadership responsibilities naturally expand beyond what any single person can effectively handle. Yet many organizations struggle to identify exactly what types of leadership they need to scale successfully. According to Stripe's 2024 Developer Report, 96% of engineering leaders report their teams spend more time on coordination and meetings than actual coding once they pass 50 developers, with an average of 42% of engineering time lost to "organizational overhead."
Through working with multiple SaaS engineering teams, I've observed that effective engineering leadership breaks down into four distinct areas, each requiring different skills and focus. Understanding these distinctions helps growing teams distribute leadership responsibilities more effectively and identify critical gaps before they become bottlenecks.
The Four Essential Leadership Areas
1. People Management: Developing Your Team
People management focuses on the growth, well-being, and performance of individual team members.
Core responsibilities:
- Performance reviews and career development planning
- One-on-one meetings and mentoring
- Conflict resolution and team dynamics
- Hiring decisions and onboarding new team members
Example roles: Engineering Managers, Team Leads with direct reports
People managers ensure your engineers develop their skills, feel supported in their roles, and understand how their work contributes to larger goals. This leadership becomes increasingly important as teams grow and individual relationships become harder to maintain naturally. Research shows that managers actively involved in team development lead to a 59% reduction in turnover, emphasizing the critical nature of people management in retaining top talent.
2. Project Organization: Coordinating Delivery
Project organization ensures work flows smoothly from planning to production, managing the complexity of multiple concurrent efforts.
Core responsibilities:
- Timeline management and dependency coordination
- Release planning and execution
- Cross-team communication and alignment
- Scope management and delivery accountability
Example roles: Project Managers, Scrum Masters, Release Managers
Project organizers excel at seeing the big picture across multiple workstreams and ensuring nothing falls through the cracks. They're particularly valuable when teams work on interconnected features or when coordination across multiple teams is required. The need for this role becomes evident as teams scale. Standish Group research shows that only 9% of software projects in larger companies are completed on time and budget, highlighting the critical importance of effective project coordination.
3. Developer Experience: Optimizing How We Build
Developer Experience leadership focuses on the tools, processes, and standards that determine how efficiently your team builds and ships software.
Key areas of focus:
- Development workflow optimization
- CI/CD pipeline design and maintenance
- Tooling selection and integration
- Development standards and best practices
- Build and deployment processes
Example roles: Platform Engineers, Developer Productivity Engineers, DevOps specialists
Developer Experience leaders ask questions like "How can we reduce the time from code commit to production?" and "What's slowing down our developers most?" Their work multiplies the effectiveness of the entire engineering team. The impact is substantial. Google's DORA research found that organizations with optimized CI/CD deploy 208 times more often and have lead times that are 106 times faster than their peers. Understanding how developers should prioritize their daily work is crucial for designing workflows that support rather than hinder productivity.
4. Platform Architecture: Technical Strategy and Vision
Platform Architecture involves the high-level technical decisions that shape your system's long-term capabilities and constraints.
Key areas of focus:
- System architecture design and evolution
- Technology selection and adoption
- Technical debt management and prioritization
- Scalability and performance planning
- Integration patterns and service boundaries
Example roles: Principal Engineers, Staff Engineers, Technical Architects
Architectural leaders think several quarters ahead, ensuring today's technical decisions support tomorrow's business needs while balancing current requirements with future flexibility.
Why This Framework Matters
As teams grow, trying to handle all four areas without dedicated focus creates predictable problems:
When People Management is neglected: Team members feel unsupported, career development stagnates, and turnover increases. You'll see this in exit interviews citing "lack of growth opportunities" and declining engagement scores.
When Project Organization is weak: Deadlines become unreliable, dependencies go unmanaged, and teams duplicate effort. The symptom is stakeholders losing confidence in engineering estimates and frequently asking "When will this actually be done?"
When Developer Experience lags: Development velocity slows as teams fight their tools instead of building features. You'll notice engineers spending more time on builds, deployments, and environment issues than actual coding.
When Platform Architecture isn't prioritized: Technical debt accumulates rapidly, making future changes increasingly expensive. Research by Code Climate reveals that developers spend approximately 23% of their working time dealing with technical debt, representing a significant drag on team productivity that compounds over time. The warning sign is when "simple" changes start taking weeks instead of days.
Applying This Framework
Start with an assessment:
Map your current team against these four areas. Who's handling each type of leadership? Are there gaps, or areas where one person is stretched too thin?
Identify your highest priority gap:
- Frequent missed deadlines often indicate project organization needs
- Developer complaints about slow, painful processes suggest developer experience gaps
- Team morale or retention issues may point to people management needs
- Mounting technical debt or architectural concerns suggest platform architecture attention is needed
Consider your team size and organizational implications:
- Under 10 people: One person might effectively handle 2-3 areas, but identify which areas they're strongest in and plan for future splits
- 10-25 people: You usually need at least 2-3 people covering all four areas. Consider establishing "leadership pairs" where responsibilities are shared but have clear primary owners
- 25+ people: Each area typically needs dedicated focus. At this scale, you need formal leadership structure with clear reporting relationships and decision-making authority
- 50+ people: Multiple leaders per area become necessary, requiring coordination mechanisms between leadership teams
Plan transitions thoughtfully:
As you grow, responsibilities can be gradually separated. Someone who started as a technical lead handling architecture and developer experience might transition to focus primarily on architecture as the team adds a dedicated platform engineer. When making these transitions, consider which responsibilities each leader is uniquely qualified versus well qualified to handle. This helps ensure the right work stays with the right people.
Implementation Strategy
The most effective approach is to strengthen one area at a time based on your current biggest constraint. Look for evidence of where leadership gaps are slowing your team down most, then address that area first. Remember that not all work is equally important. Focus your leadership development efforts on areas that will create the most significant impact for your team's growth and effectiveness.
Remember that these areas often overlap and interact. Improvements in developer experience can reduce project coordination complexity, while better people management can improve technical decision-making. The goal isn't rigid separation but ensuring each area gets appropriate attention.
Teams that recognize and address these four distinct leadership needs tend to scale more smoothly and maintain higher velocity as they grow. Research from Frontiers in Psychology found that engineering teams with shared leadership across these different areas show significantly higher task performance and team viability, particularly during early project phases. Teams that don't address these leadership areas often find themselves repeatedly hitting the same types of bottlenecks despite adding more people.
Related Content
