Why Your Team's Productivity Drops After Every Change

You promote your best engineer to team lead. Three weeks later, productivity has tanked and people are frustrated. Sound familiar?

(If you're facing this situation right now and need immediate help, my interim engineering leadership service can step in while your team stabilizes.)

Here's what most engineering leaders don't realize: this productivity drop is completely normal and predictable. When you promote your best engineer, you're getting hit twice. You lose your best individual contributor while the team figures out how to work together. Understanding the four types of engineering leadership helps explain why this transition is so challenging.

The Double Productivity Hit

Years ago, organizational change managers taught me about the four phases teams go through after any significant change: forming, storming, norming, and performing. Every team experiences these phases. Not some teams. Every team.

Research shows that 60% of new managers never receive any training when transitioning to leadership roles, and consequently 60% fail within their first 24 months largely due to inadequate preparation for managing team transitions.

But there's an additional cost leaders miss. When you promote your best person into a new role, you've effectively lost your best performer in their previous role. While they're learning to be a manager, their individual contribution drops significantly. Combined with team formation challenges, you get a double productivity hit.

I've seen this pattern repeatedly across different companies. Leaders who recognize and manage these phases get back to high performance quickly. Those who don't get stuck in the productivity dip for months.

The Four Phases Every Team Experiences

Phase 1: Forming (Weeks 1-2)

What's happening: Everyone maintains existing patterns while cautiously assessing new dynamics. People focus on understanding roles and avoiding conflict.

Productivity level: Appears stable (80-90% of baseline), but if you promoted someone, you're already missing their individual contributor output.

Warning signs: Overly formal communication, reluctance to make decisions, postponing difficult conversations

Phase 2: Storming (Weeks 3-8, longer if unmanaged)

What's happening: Conflicting work styles and expectations create friction. The team confronts fundamental questions about processes, decision-making, and accountability.

Productivity level: Major decline. Time shifts from execution to resolving team dynamics. Research shows that 80% of organizations experience transformation challenges, with only one-third achieving successful outcomes, making productivity planning during transitions essential for high-performing organizations.

Critical intervention point: This is where most failed team transitions get stuck. Active facilitation is essential.

Warning signs of stalled storming: Personal conflicts escalating, team members disengaging, stakeholders expressing concern about delays

Phase 3: Norming (Weeks 6-10)

What's happening: The team establishes shared processes and communication patterns. Individual strengths become clear and leveraged.

Productivity level: Recovery phase (75-85% of baseline), with your promoted person gaining effectiveness in their new role.

Strategic focus: Document emerging best practices for future transitions

Phase 4: Performing (Week 10+)

What's happening: The team operates with high trust and efficiency. Diversity becomes a strength, and your promoted person has become effective in their new role.

Productivity level: Exceeds baseline (105-120%). The investment in team development pays dividends.

Benchmark: High-performing teams maintain this level consistently, with resilience to handle future changes more quickly

Strategic Framework for Managing Transitions

Decision Framework: When to Proceed vs. Delay

Before making changes, assess your timing:

Proceed when:

• Team has been stable for 3+ months
• No other major organizational changes in flight
• Adequate management bandwidth to support transition
• Business can absorb 6-8 weeks of reduced output

Delay when:

• Multiple changes happening simultaneously
• Critical deadlines within next 8 weeks
• Recent departures or additions (within last 3 months)
• Remote/distributed teams without strong communication infrastructure

For senior leadership: Budget for productivity impact for 6-8 weeks. Factor this into project timelines and resource planning.

Assess Your Current Situation

Recent organizational changes:

• Added or lost team members in last 3 months?
• Promoted individual contributors to leadership roles?
• Changed reporting structures or team boundaries?
• Shifted priorities or technology stacks?

Identify which phase you're in:

• Forming: Stable metrics but increased meeting time, formal communication patterns
• Storming: Major productivity drop, increased time-to-resolution, elevated conflict indicators
• Norming: Productivity recovering, process discussions decreasing
• Performing: Sustained productivity above baseline, proactive collaboration

Phase-Specific Leadership Actions

In storming (most critical phase):

• Acknowledge productivity drops as normal and temporary
• Facilitate explicit discussions: "What working styles are conflicting?"
• Schedule weekly one-on-ones to monitor individual stress levels
• Communicate status to stakeholders: "We're in a planned transition phase"
• Consider bringing in external facilitation for teams stuck beyond 8 weeks

In norming:

• Focus on process documentation and shared decision-making frameworks
• Implement effective time management across the three levels for new leaders
• Begin succession planning conversations for future transitions

In performing:

• Document successful practices for organizational learning
• Use metrics like burndown chart patterns to establish new performance baselines
• Plan for next change cycle with lessons learned

Stakeholder Communication Strategy

Set realistic expectations upfront:

• Plan for 8-12 weeks to reach performing phase
• Expect 4-6 weeks of significant productivity impact
• Provide weekly progress updates during storming phase

Key things to track:

• Story point velocity
• Code review cycle time
• Customer-facing deliverable timeline adherence
• Team satisfaction

Risk Management and Intervention Strategies

Early warning signs requiring intervention:

• Storming phase extending beyond 8 weeks
• Individual team members expressing intent to leave
• Customer-escalated quality issues increasing
• Stakeholder confidence declining significantly

Intervention strategies:

• Bring in experienced external facilitator
• Temporarily reassign critical deliverables to stable teams
• Provide additional management support and coaching
• Consider adjusting team composition if cultural fit issues emerge

For complex scenarios:

• Multiple concurrent changes: Extend timelines significantly, assign dedicated change management resources
• Remote teams: Add structured communication protocols, increase check-in frequency
• Tight deadlines: Consider temporary team augmentation or scope reduction
• High-stakes projects: Implement parallel team structure for critical path items

The Leadership Difference: Strategic vs. Reactive Management

Teams that move through these phases quickly have leaders who recognize what's happening and actively facilitate the transition. They don't ignore conflicts or get frustrated when productivity temporarily drops. This requires focusing on the right work rather than just good work during these transition periods.

High-performing leaders approach transitions strategically:

1. Proactive planning: They factor transition costs into project timelines and resource allocation
2. Data-driven decisions: They track leading indicators, not just productivity metrics
3. Stakeholder management: They communicate transition phases to business stakeholders as planned investments
4. System thinking: They consider how changes interact with existing organizational dynamics

The business case for intentional transition management:

Organizations that invest in structured transition support see faster time-to-performance and lower turnover during change periods. While team development timelines vary significantly based on leadership effectiveness and project complexity, active transition management consistently accelerates the journey to high performance. The upfront investment in facilitation and support pays dividends in retained talent and accelerated team performance.

For senior engineering leadership:

Your role extends beyond individual team transitions to organizational change capacity. Track how many teams are in transition simultaneously, and avoid overloading your organization's change bandwidth.

Your job isn't to prevent these phases. It's to guide your team through them efficiently while maintaining organizational effectiveness.

Next time you make a team change, expect the double productivity hit. Plan for it. Budget for it. Help your team understand that the temporary drop isn't failure, it's the necessary work of becoming a better team. Most importantly, use this as an opportunity to build organizational learning about managing change effectively.

Key takeaways for engineering leaders:

• Treat team transitions as planned investments, not unexpected costs
• Develop organizational capabilities for managing multiple concurrent changes
• Use transition periods to identify and develop future change leaders
• Build measurement systems that capture both productivity impact and team development progress
• Create playbooks that reduce transition time and improve success rates for future changes

---

Connsulting Blog RSS

Related Content